Epistemic circularity an essay on the problem of meta-justification

An example is an argument for the general reliability of sense-perception that makes use of sensory beliefs among its premises; as William Alston has pointed out, epistemic circularity poses a difficult problem for defending the reliability of sense-perception.

Epistemic circularity an essay on the problem of meta-justification

Dissertation, The Ohio State University Abstract Epistemic circularity is, roughly stated, a property of an argument such that its conclusion must be true if one may be said to have a justified belief in its premises.

An example is an argument for the general reliability of sense-perception that makes use of sensory beliefs among its premises; as William Alston has pointed out, epistemic circularity poses a difficult problem for defending the reliability of sense-perception.

It is also a key element in for a related meta-epistemological problem, dubbed here The Problem of Meta-Justification.

Download options

First we pose a question: The difficulty can be neatly stated in the form of a Meta-Regress Argument similar to the classic regress argument for foundationalism.

The options offered by the Meta-Regress Argument are: But no one has adequately argued that epistemic, circularity is indeed virtuous, and several arguments can be deployed showing it to be vicious. Meta-coherentists, drawing on insights related to the Method of Reflective Equilibrium, might try to find ways to mitigate the viciousness; but their attempts fail.

Varieties of particularism and methodism, two positions on the Problem of the Criterion, might also be offered as a way to escape epistemic circularity; but these views too fall prey to serious objections. It is possible, however, that there are some beliefs that are epistemically rational but nonjustified.

Such beliefs can support justification standards without themselves being justified.

State Government Links

In this way, meta-skepticism can be avoided. This solution to the Problem of Meta-Justification is developed in Chapter 4 in a way that owes a heavy debt to the epistemology of the great Scots philosopher, Thomas Reid Keywords No keywords specified fix it Categories.Jul 08,  · Lawrence Mark Sanger Q Lawrence Mark Sanger Lawrence Mark Sanger Sanger,_Lawrence Mark American Internet project developer, co-founder of Wikipedia, and the founder of Citizendium; more comonly known as Larry Sanger.

I posted a book-length essay, How and Why I Taught My Toddler to Read when the blog launched. I have “come out” as an advocate of teaching tiny tots to read.

I have “come out” as . Find Enlightenment. Table of Contents; Preamble and Introduction; Chapter 1; Chapter 2; Chapter 3; Chapter 4; Notes. Indeed Sanger has a philosophy PhD (his Ohio State doctoral thesis is titled “Epistemic Circularity: An Essay on the Problem of Meta-Justification”), while Wales almost completed a PhD in finance.

Sanger, Lawrence. "Epistemic circularity: an essay on the problem of meta-justification /." Electronic Thesis or Dissertation. Ohio State University, Sanger, Lawrence. "Epistemic circularity: an essay on the problem of meta-justification /." Electronic Thesis or Dissertation.

Ohio State University,

Epistemic circularity an essay on the problem of meta-justification
Lawrence Mark Sanger - Wikisource, the free online library