Persuasive essay on the twin towers

The Destruction of the World Trade Center: This approach, which shows every aspect of the official story to be problematic, provides the most effective challenge to the official story. But this way of presenting the evidence has one great limitation, especially when used in lectures and essays: It means that the treatment of every particular issue must be quite brief, hence superficial.

Persuasive essay on the twin towers

The Destruction of the World Trade Center: This approach, which shows every aspect of the official story to be problematic, provides the most effective challenge to the official story. But this way of presenting the evidence has one great limitation, especially when used in lectures and essays: It means that the treatment of every particular issue must be quite brief, hence superficial.

People can thereby be led to suspect that a more thorough treatment of any particular issue might show the official story to be plausible after all. In the present essay, I focus on one question: I will begin with the question of why the Twin Towers collapsed, then raise the same question about building 7.

What do these men mean by this expression? They mean only that we should reject outrageous theories. But what distinguishes an outrageous theory from a non-outrageous one? This is one of the central questions in the philosophy of science.

The mark of a good theory is that it can explain, in a coherent way, all or at least most of the relevant facts and is not contradicted by any of them. A bad theory is one that Persuasive essay on the twin towers contradicted by some of the relevant facts.

An outrageous theory would be one that is contradicted by virtually all the relevant facts. With this definition in mind, let us look at the official theory about the Twin Towers, which says that they collapsed because of the combined effect of the impact of the airplanes and the resulting fires.

The report put out by FEMA said: This theory clearly belongs in the category of outrageous theories, because is it is contradicted by virtually all the relevant facts.

Although this statement may seem extreme, I will explain why it is not. Defenders of the official story seldom if ever mention this simple fact. Indeed, the supposedly definitive report put out by NISTthe National Institute for Standards and Technology even implies that fire-induced collapses of large steel-frame buildings are normal events Hoffman, Defenders of the official theory, of course, say that the collapses were caused not simply by the fire but the fire combined with the damage caused by the airliners.

The towers, however, were designed to withstand the impact of airliners about the same size as Boeing s. Hyman Brown, the construction manager of the Twin Towers, said: Likewise, the NIST Report, in discussing how the impact of the planes contributed to the collapse, focuses primarily on the claim that the planes dislodged a lot of the fire-proofing from the steel.

One might say, of course, that there is a first time for everything, and that a truly extraordinary fire might induce a collapse. Let us examine this idea.

What would count as an extraordinary fire? Given the properties of steel, a fire would need to be very hot, very big, and very long-lasting.

Favorite Pornstars

But the fires in the towers did not have even one of these characteristics, let alone all three. There have been claims, to be sure, that the fires were very hot. Some television specials claimed that the towers collapsed because the fire was hot enough to melt the steel.

These claims, however, are absurd. We can, accordingly, dismiss the claim that the towers collapsed because their steel columns melted. Most defenders of the official theory, in fact, do not make this absurd claim.

They say merely that the fire heated the steel up to the point where it lost so much of its strength that it buckled.

The Westerlands

But for even this claim to plausible, the fires would have still had to be pretty hot. But they were not. Claims have been made, as we have seen, about the jet fuel. But much of it burned up very quickly in the enormous fireballs produced when the planes hit the buildings, and rest was gone within 10 minutes, after which the flames died down.

Photographs of the towers 15 minutes after they were struck show few flames and lots of black smoke, a sign that the fires were oxygen-starved.

Persuasive essay on the twin towers

There are reasons to believe, moreover, that the fires were not even that hot. As photographs show, the fires did not break windows or even spread much beyond their points of origin Hufschmid,p.Begin it where warm waters halt This is the key line of the poem.

If you can find this place everything else will fall into place. I thought we had found it. To me this was the place where the glorious Rio Grande river begins its plunge into the gorge at about the New Mexico/Colorado border. More than 1, engineers and architects have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report.

Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/ Parenting articles, news and tips on raising happy, healthy, successful kids and teens. Range of Brands Will Seamlessly Integrate with Sonos Sound Platform and Can be Controlled Directly from the Sonos App UPPER SADDLE RIVER, NJ, May 15, – Onkyo Corp and Onkyo USA today announced that its network receiver brands are now certified and compatible with the Sonos® platform, earning the Works with Sonos badge.

The written history of New York City began with the first European explorer the Italian Giovanni da Verrazzano in European settlement began with the Dutch in The "Sons of Liberty" destroyed British authority in New York City, and the Stamp Act Congress of representatives from throughout the Thirteen Colonies met in the city in to organize resistance to British policies.

EDITOR'S NOTE: An earlier version of this essay was the basis for lectures delivered in West Hartford, Connecticut, Manchester and Burlington, Vermont, and New York City in October, Griffin is the author of numerous books, two on the subject of the 9/11/01 attacks: The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/

The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows