Solish Franchising has come of age. Franchisees have the advantage of independent ownership, with the assurance of goodwill generated by a network of businesses and the availability of assistance if the business runs into trouble. Franchisors can expand their concepts more quickly with reduced capital expenditure as their successes are fueled by the motivation brought by independent franchisee entrepreneurs. What Is a Franchise?
Legal aid franchising -- two fifths miss full franchise 3 August No comments Franchising was finally born this week after a troubled gestation when it was announced that some offices of about legal aid firms had been offered contracts on 1 August.
These are viewed by many as the element of franchising most attractive to firms. Steve Orchard, LAB chief executive, said firms which had not been given devolved powers would have to wait 'several months' while the board studied their systems further.
Many had not been given the full franchise, he said, because the volume of work in certain fields had not been high enough for board officials to make a full evaluation. Mr Orchard and board chairman John Pitts this week shied away from an outright suggestion that franchised firms would be better than non-franchised outfits, but they did point out the marketing advantages.
Mr Orchard said the board was aiming to double the number of franchised firms within the next 18 months. He expressed disappointment at the relatively low number of applications from London, south Wales and Tyneside, but said there would be no specif ic drive aimed at getting law firms in those areas on board.
The Law Society said this week that it would be 'making representations to the board for more information' on why such a high percentage of firms had not been offered devolved powers.
The contract offers came a fortnight after the Society's Council had lifted its temporary embargo on the franchising contracts see letter to practitioners from Society President Charles Elly below. The board received applications for contracts from about offices before the beginning of last November, the deadline for the first tranche.
In some cases, firms based at several sites had one office approved for a contract while another office was rejected. The public will be able to recognise franchised firms by a new colour logo and the board is planning a series of newspaper advertisements.
Firms granted a contract will also be allowed to advertise their franchise. I am very pleased that our negotiations with the Legal Aid Board have enabled us to achieve substantial improvements to the terms which were on offer before the Council took its determined stand in April.
With goodwill on both sides, we have managed to obtain most of the changes to the contract, specification and the franchise manual which the profession asked for in our consultation meetings.
Most of all, however, I believe we have achieved a change in attitude. As I have said on another occasion, the key to success is partnership. The board has recognised that to rely on fear within the profession driving firms into franchising does not make for a true partnership between us.
Franchising will not work without co-operation. There is no doubt that by your united response to the Council's advice in April not to enter franchising, you have enabled us to achieve these very significant improvements.
Now, whatever your decision, the Law Society will represent you to the best of its ability. We are building on the success of our co-ordination arrangements over the last few months to set up a franchise-holders group, but we will also continue to represent those who wish to carry on with legal aid but decide not to apply for a franchise.
Both categories are represented within the leadership of your profession. I know that many of you remain fearful of the government's ultimate intentions for legal aid. I cannot pretend that I do not have my own fears, but I can reassure you to this extent.Abel's study begins at a time when pressures for fundamental reform of legal aid were becoming intense.
To understand the source of the developments of the s which Rick Abel recounts in such detail it is necessary to hark back to the battles of the late s when legal aid began.
The commitment. The Legal Aid Board now wants to do more than improve its existing procedures: it wants to change them in accordance with latest business practice.
Hence, franchising. PLEA is hosting a panel of legal specialists discussing the topical issue: LGBTIQ legal rights. The evening will explore current changes to legislation, changes still needed to ensure equal human rights, and experiences of the LGBTIQ community working in law.
Legal Aid is a leading provider of quality, professional legal services, ensuring effective access to justice for the poor and vulnerable, in an independent and caring manner.
ABA Diversity and Inclusion Resources Access a wealth of association-wide diversity and inclusion programs, resources, and information, including toolkits, training videos, statistical data, fellowships, scholarships, upcoming diversity programs, and more.
pro bono attorneys Pro bono attorneys are lawyers who take on lawsuits in anticipation of a monetary settlement to which they would be entitled a percentage.
This practice is fairly common in specific types of court cases like personal injury cases, and in large class action lawsuits, but pro bono lawyers are very selective in the cases they.